Sunday, April 19, 2015

Mass Liquidation - the emotional and logistial challenges of de-stuffing

With the house under contract, the car replaced by a van, and less that 7 weeks until we leave, it's time to start getting rid anything that won't fit in the van. And while we never accumulated much in the first place, letting go of what we do have is a lot more difficult that I'd expected. And it's difficult for both emotional and logistical reasons.

1. It's worth less. A lot less than we paid for it, and even less than that. And while rationally, that's  understandable, it's still hard to accept. For instance, there's my Big Agnes LuLu down sleeping bag and pad. New, they sells for $220. In like new condition I haven't even been able to sell them for $60.00. Someone offered $20 for the pad, and then asked me to include shipping. (The exception to this rule are the junker cars and trucks that S.D. buys. He's bought and sold a car a year for the last 6 years and comes out ahead every time.)

2. Some of the stuff defines you, or rather it's the owning of the stuff that defines you. All due respect to Henry David Thoreau, but sometimes this feels like a good thing. My kayak. Eliza, falls into this category. I love kayaking. Being right on the water. Exploring the tides, riding the waves, paddling along. I am therefore, someone who owns a kayak. And while having the kayak on top of the van, bicycles hanging off the back would look cool, the reality is there is not much opportunity for kayaking on the PCT, nor does trailering a kayak on a bike tour make much sense. And so the kayak, the paddles, the life vest, all must go.  Went yesterday actually.  This morning I'm still feeling the sad emptiness of being a kayak-less, kayaker.

3. Varieties of stuff give you options. Shoes, for instance.  Having lots of different kinds of shoes gives you infinite options. For hiking alone there are five options: regular trail shoes, waterproof, lightweight trail-running, leather hi-top boots and insulated winter boots  Somehow I have to whittle the collection down to three?  and I have two in each of those categories. Then there are dress shoes. I can only keep one whereas now, I have no clue what the count is, the options currently are endless. What one shoe can fill them all?

4. Some stuff represents stories, or places, or people. Stuff makes experience concrete. Will giving up the stuff lighten the attachment?  Originally I insisted on taking "Herman" our mythical fish painting. Not only is it a cool painting it's the first, and only, painting S.D. and I selected together, and we bought it the first year of our six years here on the North Shore of Boston. To me, it symbolizes our time here. Keeping Herman would keep the connection to that time of our lives.  And yet...."Herman" is a big painting, roughly 3' x 5'. Taking it would require some significant van space.  And so "Herman" is getting sold too.

5. It's biological impossible to take/keep. The spice bush that is now growing on the hill in the front
corner is a fourth generation offspring of the spice bush from my first home in Hopkington, RI. In fact, many of the plants in the garden are progeny of plants I've had at other houses. Since 1984 I've moved 7 times, and in all but 2 of those moves, there have been gardens, gardens that often were filled with plants moved from the previous house, or from my mother's last garden. The Siberian Iris's from Tom Wheeler Road, the Shasta Daisies from Clarks Falls Road, the Lord Camden, and Peach Daylillies from the house on Hangman Hill, all in North Stonington. The Blue Lace Cap Hydrangea is from Mystic.  The cranesbill geraniums, Montauk Daisies and Black Bearded Iris are from Mom's house.  Don't tell S.D. but I did, once, seriously try and figure out a way to take something of these with us. After all, many are tubers that can stay dormant for long periods. But, considering we probably won't have a place to plant anything for three years, I just had to let it go. Watching everything come up, one last spring, is bittersweet. I do hope the new owners appreciate them.

And then there are the logistical reasons.

6. Getting someone to just take your stuff, all your stuff is hard. Sure we can find someone who will come in and cherry pick, give us a small check and take most of the stuff. But then we're left with a couple truck loads with no where to go just when we have everywhere to go.

7. Craigslist. Do I really need to say more?  Selling, or giving away stuff through Craigslist is always an interesting experience. Stuff you think will sell, doesn't. Stuff you think no one would even take for free disappears in minutes. And always there are the interesting email offers and negotiations.  It's fun, and interesting if you have a lot of time. Not so great for mass liquidation.

And so, as hard as it's going be we're going to have a yard sale/charity donation. More of a liquidation, we're-selling-it-all sale, two weeks before we leave. Everything we need to keep for the trip and  selected family heirlooms are going into the van, the rest is going to sold or given away.

-------------------------------

Originally this post started with the following:

Whoever said "I think therefore I am" obviously didn't live in the United States.  Here, the correct existentialist statement is more along the lines of "I own, therefore I am".  Without stuff it's harder to know who you are. If I don't own, who am I?  

I'm starting to think that aside from being someone who doesn't own anything, I'm starting to get very excited about the options.

1 comment:

Anonymous said...

Our life is frittered away by detail... simplify, simplify.

Henry David Thoreau